Ron Brynaert's Bleatifications

tweeted May 2nd to a real supertroll
promoting the Rauhauser/Kimberlin
convolution

This is what I think is going on with Ron Brynaert. I think he is concern trolling and probably paid for his efforts. It must be a tough balancing act because, if true, he has to support his employers' objectives while making it appear he is an independent nutjob. It's possible he's simply a very confused individual. Though, imho, he is paid to post for Team Numbnuts.

Folks can go back in time and see how he smeared me as having menaced Kimberlin. He called me a supertroll. When given proof of November 14th perjury, he tweeted the equivalent of hmmph. Lately he has made a transparent effort to convey the idea he is not a BradBlog/VR agent. But we're to believe it was a coincidence he was recently frontpaged by Brad Friedman and more recently libelled Aaron Worthing based on the word of Brad's closest associate? Ron thinks we are supposed to forget all that?

And now Ron has rejumped the shark. Today May 10th he tweeted the following.



The only one who fits that description is Aaron. Maybe Brynaert thinks he is being clever by not mentioning him directly as in past tweets. However, I'm not sure how he can expect to not be found guilty of further defamation, if he persists with such allegations. There is no shadow of a doubt escape clause for civil cases. He is acting precisely like Rauhauser by making such outrageous claims.

In a previous entry, I put up screenshots of Ron claiming Aaron had committed criminal assault on Kimberlin. Ron didn't couch it as alleged. He made the critical error of tweeting it as factual.

Now he's claiming Aaron is blackmailing him for 20 grand? Now he's astroturfing the Team Breibart, criminal conspiracy hoax? Yet he's also willing to testify for Aaron while contemplating reporting him to the police for blackmail? NOT BELIEVABLE!

I could go on and on parsing Ron's style of convolution. But that's what he and similar supertrolls desire. They want confusion to reign. They want folks to waste time reading their hoax garbage.

Nonetheless, the main question surrounding Ron is fascinating. Is he paid to post or simply deluded?



That was Ron running interference for Brad Friedman. Clearly Brett played a role in Raw Story's emergence. I think he's trying to make light of Kimberlin's role with them and thus such thinking can also be extended to Brad. I asked Ron to expose BradBlog/VR hoaxing, but all I got in return were crickets chirping and later on more invasion into my personal space.

Here is a tweet showing Ron pimping for Brett as having not set the bombs. And we'll then have more on that in a bit. And uhm, I'm positive Mark Singer believes Brett set the Speedway bombs which led to Carl Delong's maiming. So how would Mark Singer have had a problem with the judgment? And Ron wonders why so many believe he is working for VR? He knows why. It's because of junk like this.



Ron Brynaert is obviously supporting the Speedway Bomber. Why else did he just tweet this?



And to top it off so there are no doubts what Brynaert has been up to, let's take a looksie at some extensive Brynaert excerpts shedding doubt on Brett Kimberlin being behind the Speedway bombings. Then ask yourselves why would he be doing that for free?




A concern troll is one who tries to give the impression of objectivity and sincerity while attacking natural consensus building based on facts. In this case, Ron has been trying to make it seem he has no dog in the Brad Friedman/VR hunt. However, he is simply offering nothing but misdirection. He has never covered their outrageous, election fraud hoaxes. He's even tried to shed doubt on Brett Kimberlin having set the Speedway bombs. He's tried to make a mockery of the idea that Brett Kimberlin should have been a primary suspect for the murder of Julia Scyphers. If he's not paid by VR and/or Brett, why is he astroturfing such rubbish? He continued.





Why didn't Ron discuss what the motive might have been for the murder of Julia Scyphers? Not relevant? How could that not be relevant? Ron has smeared myself, Mandy, Patrick, Aaron, and Dustin simply for blogging the truth about Brett Kimberlin. Those four can be tied to Andrew Breitbart. And who has had a website devoted to indicting him? Which internet predator on the run from New Jersey authorities for harassing Mike used to have IndictBreitbart.org as his Daily Kos signature? And Ron wonders why we think he works for them? What kind of idiots does he take newbies and fence-sitters for? Here's more Ron Brynaert supporting the Kimberlin lie he never set the bombs.




Take note of how he followed the Alexandrovna approach of astroturfing Brett didn't set the bombs despite there being plenty of proof. Ron's objective was two-fold. His crowd wants to accept that Brett was only involved in the drug trade and nothing else. Oh those crazy pot people! He also wanted to attack Mandy and Patrick Frey. What he didn't mention was the strange relationship Brett had with Julia Scyphers' very young granddaughter. Nor did Ron mention how Julia was fed up with Brett and taking action to protect her family.

Julia Scyphers was killed execution-style. She wasn't robbed. Who had the motive to do that? Why was Ron twisting the truth to fit in with double secret exoneration hoax? And I'm not so sure Fred only got a glimpse of Bowman. But I've lent my Singer book to a friend.

Ayn Rand Was A Stupid, Sociopathic Wench

This year's nominations for Supertroll of the Year (Meta Magazine®) offer up some splendid choices, including Ron Brynaert and Neal Rauhauser. While we await that decision, I thought we'd take a quick looksie back at who won the award in 1957.

There are two types of people in this world. We have folks who care deeply for humanity. We have folks who only care about themselves, their immediate family, and those they consider close friends. Ayn Rand was a member of the latter.

Unlike what many on the right believe, Ayn Rand was anything but a scholar. Her academic background is sketchy. It appears she only made it through an undergraduate degree before heading off to Hollywood to become a screenwriter.

One can watch this idiot in action during a 1959 interview with Mike Wallace. Check out how awkward she was. She wasn't exactly a people person. That makes sense considering her writings exposed herself as a sociopath. We'll get to those in a bit.



Now contrast that Wallace interview with one of a real scholar, Erich Fromm. I believe there is a fundamental difference between right and left. Conservatives simply do not much care for anyone but themselves. Ayn Rand actually considered it immoral to be our brother's keeper, that altruism is a sin. Those on the left tend to have big hearts and are basically true sweeties.



Ayn Rand as Sociopath

Yes, it's true. Here's the proof.

Romancing the Stone-Cold Killer: Ayn Rand and William Hickman by Michael Prescott

A bit of narcissism can be healthy. It's called self-confidence. But the problem with reactionary thinkers is they take it too far. They become in essence Calvinists with hard-ons for Friedrich Nietzsche.

They confuse luck for skill. They believe those who achieve so-called success always merit it, and that those who don't are fundamentally flawed. Such people miss the point of Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment; In the recesses of their deranged minds, the point isn't that Raskolnikov was an anti-social creep, but that indeed some people are truly better than others and are supermen. Those on the right are incapable of realising there's a minority of self-serving fatfockfaces destroying the planet.

One of Ayn Rand's "crowning achievements" was Atlas Shrugged written in 1957. But before then in 1943, she found success with The Fountainhead. Hmmm. Her hero Howard Roark was a criminal, but it was society's fault, not his. Now go back to the Prescott article. Soak in how Ayn Rand was an admirer of the sociopath William Edward Hickman. The truth of Ayn Rand starts to add up. One can then have a better grasp of the nature of conservatism as a form of mental illness.

Great Minds Think Alike

I've had a draft of this entry on the back burner for a month or two. Today I stumbled across a pleasant surprise. George Monbiot of The Guardian recently penned, A Manifesto for Psychopaths. Yay! For an unpaid blogger who likes to mail them in, this is manna from heaven.

(fair use excerpt) Atlas Shrugged, published in 1957, depicts a United States crippled by government intervention, in which heroic millionaires struggle against a nation of spongers. The millionaires, whom she portrays as Atlas holding the world aloft, withdraw their labour, with the result that the nation collapses. It is rescued, through unregulated greed and selfishness, by one of the heroic plutocrats, John Galt.

The poor die like flies as a result of government programmes and their own sloth and fecklessness. Those who try to help them are gassed. In a notorious passage, she argues that all the passengers in a train filled with poisoned fumes deserved their fate(2,3). One, for example, was a teacher who taught children to be team players; one was a mother married to a civil servant, who cared for her children; one was a housewife “who believed that she had the right to elect politicians, of whom she knew nothing”.

Rand’s is the philosophy of the psychopath, a misanthropic fantasy of cruelty, revenge and greed. Yet, as Gary Weiss shows in his new book Ayn Rand Nation, she has become to the new right what Karl Marx once was to the left: a demi-god at the head of a chiliastic cult(4). Almost one-third of Americans, according to a recent poll, have read Atlas Shrugged(5), and it now sells hundreds of thousands of copies every year.

Ayn Rand basically created a cult. If she were still alive, Ayn Rand would probably be pimping for Mitt Rmoney. Which makes sense. Mitt is also cult member whose wife purchases $1,000 shirts.

Conservatives have been and always will be the party of the rich. They are able to win office because they effectively prey on weak-minded useful idiots. Of course Obama is a lousy president. Mitt would take us to an even uglier place. Hopefully the vast majority of voters haven't forgotten what the corrupt GW Bush administration did. We can expect more of that, if somehow the sociopathic, greedy Republicans return to the Oval Office.


Mitt Romney’s Mormonism

Layman Interpretation of Swat Call Compared to Voice of Ron Brynaert

aspiring intrepid reporter
or supertroll?

Hmmmm. Well, is Brad Friedman an intrepid reporter or one who has peddled hoaxes into big money donations and fake internet gravitas? (see Connell, Michael... Curtis, Clint... Schakowsky, Jan [Democrat- Le Islande des Lesbos Espionage], Dieb-Throat, et al) There's your answer. And for crying out loud, Ron Brynaert guest blogged for Brad Friedman as recently as March 10th, 2011. (see relations, incestuous)

I have zero training in voice recognition. Nonetheless, I feel compelled to compare the swatting call on Mike Stack with audio of Ron Brynaert.

Listen to the following two items. The first is Ron Brynaert, the other the criminal. Are they the same person as a number of people are wondering?

1) Nicole Sandler Interviews Ron Brynaert

2) Swatting Audio



Ron Brynaert wrote, "Everyone knows I talk fast, excited, curse, and I’m damn glibber than that caller. His voice has a weird accent and is more nasally."

That's odd, because an immediate description of Brynaert that comes to mind is that he sounds very nasal.

What's interesting is how the swat caller seemed to be putting on an affected, Californian accent. If one listens carefully, there are spots where he does sound very similar to if he isn't indeed Ron Brynaert! Those brief moments are there, but one needs to really concentrate to hear them. In a few places, the swat caller's voice completely changed. Look for those.

:40 "I'm not gonna tell you that" A middle ground between monotone and nasal.

1:14 on "I don't know. I haven't checked on her in about two hours." Nasal seeping through.

2:12 "I gotta go" Steps back into full monotone.

2:24 "What do you want?" Nasal slips out.

2:44 "Yes on the, I shot her in the head." Starts out nasal then returns to monotone.

2:58 on "I gotta go." Full monotone.

Listen to Brynaert in the interview. How can he say his voice isn't nasal? For the most part he sounds like a dweeb. Though on the other hand, there are fleeting moments where he does sound like the swat caller in Califonian monotone.

Ron also wrote, "Dude, I sound nothing like that caller. And what would be my f***ing motive?"

Uhm, Ron actually does sound like the caller in those referred to moments.

As for possible motive, Lee Stranahan came up with a good one.

And — the reason for ‘throwing Ron’s name in there’ is that some people have suggested it might be Ron. And I — honestly — can’t rule that out...

Let me explain why I’m NOT ruling Ron out after hearing this call.

The long pauses before the answers. Sounds like someone restraining themselves.

Yes, Ron — I know how you sound. And YOU know how you sound. So I can predict you wouldn’t want to make yourself sound that way.

And motive? I dunno — who really seems desperate to be involved in a big story? ....

Am I the only one to notice how f***ing STRANGE Ron is? I mean — seriously. Just watch — here comes 12 questions asking me why I farted at 1:03am on July 23th as I tweeted during a radio show.

Crazy people do crazy shit.

ya dig?

That would be one possible motive. Another could be he is a paid member of Team Numbnuts. One strategy of theirs is to attempt to bully opposition into keeping their yappers shut and basically scare them into retreat.

So perhaps Mike Stack was cybersmeared and swatted thinking he would then fear making a blogging effort to clear his name. And it could also have been a message to "stifle it, Edith," to anyone else contemplating entering the fray. As in, if you don't shut up, you might be the next one to be cybersmeared and/or get an unwelcomed visit from a swat team.

I don't know if Ron Brynaert is the one who made the swat call. Nonetheless, I am in agreement with Lee Stranahan that he cannot be ruled out. He should be on any list of suspects due to his irrational postings made pertaining to Weinergate and related convolution.